Which Test Is Best ????

[bmoore]

Ive been using TEST E, but i have been getting diff remarks from alot of people, saying that there are better TEST to use, what are your all opinions, which do you think is better, i like the results ive been getting from it, but ive alot of people say that SUSTONON 300 is way better, what do you all think, please let me , know.

thank you
Brian

[bobbyrlg]

IMO, Sustanon sounds good in theory but it's not anymore effective or less effective than a single estered test. Some people like it better, to each his own.

[rAJJIN]

It just depends, As Bobbyrlg said it pretty much comes down to personal prefferance. I dont care for test prop much myself unless its in a blend such as Omnadren like you mentioned.

For strength test suspension is the clear choice imo.
For Adding some size I like the cypionate,enanthate or Omnadren
Im not Picky :D

[Tyrone]

Ive been using TEST E, but i have been getting diff remarks from alot of people, saying that there are better TEST to use, what are your all opinions, which do you think is better, i like the results ive been getting from it, but ive alot of people say that SUSTONON 300 is way better, what do you all think, please let me , know.

thank you
Brian
Well, it depends on how often you want to inject...think realistcly. The shorter the ester the more test ,and longer less overall. Asking which is best is to much of an openeded question.

[Tyree33]

Test is Test bud, unless we're talking prop which we're not. There is no relative difference between test e and test c. Either of them are a good base drug during most runs. I'm not a huge fan of sus and the ester blends, although I have had good reults w/ them. I like tio keep it simple. Don't listen to that garbage...stick to basics and u should be fine.
-T-

[OuchThatHurts]

Test is Test bud, unless we're talking prop which we're not. There is no relative difference between test e and test c. Either of them are a good base drug during most runs. I'm not a huge fan of sus and the ester blends, although I have had good reults w/ them. I like tio keep it simple. Don't listen to that garbage...stick to basics and u should be fine.
-T-Just curious. Why prop? It's just another ester of test as well. Maybe I read it wrong. Glad to see you back man.

Get Huge!

[bigpun81]

Test is test. It is the esters that are different. With that being said you will see more results from 500mg of test prop a week than you would from 500mg of test e a week. more injections mean more stable blood levels.

[Kaiser]

Just curious. Why prop? It's just another ester of test as well. Maybe I read it wrong. Glad to see you back man.

Get Huge!

You beat me to that question.

[rAJJIN]

Test is test. It is the esters that are different. With that being said you will see more results from 500mg of test prop a week than you would from 500mg of test e a week. more injections mean more stable blood levels.


well Ill disagree-
Maybe if your talking In a matter of just a few weeks or a Very short run. Ill Take some good Ole cyp or enanthate over prop anytime!
My experiences with the Prop Just havnt been that great.
It has its place depending on your goals and whats being run with it.
It alone though or for Bulking its about worthless imo

I know everyone says test is test and theres no differance.
Ive never agreed with that though... The ester changes the effects.
Maybe not On paper but in reality imo and from my experiences.
For example test suspension is Not going to swole you up like the enanthate.
BUT it will Make you Very strong and produce some quality muscle.

[Kaiser]

I think the way OTH and I view it is that Test is Test, but they do react a little different. Sort of like TrenA has a kick that TrenE doesn't. In the end though you are talking about the same compound, but shorter esters give that instant gratification and they do not hold as much molecular weight as the higher esters do so you end up getting more Test per CC. In the end, they are the same, just different ways to execute them. What I and would imagine OTH looks at is the end result. What do you get from 20ml of TestE as apposed to 20ml of TestP after PCT and a couple of weeks rolled by. In the end, IMO the only real difference would be stemmed from psych value of having the TestP kick in faster and feeling results faster. That and the fact that TestP does house more Test per square inch as explained. I also think there is a psych involved with users "giving up" and not pushing hard after a few days have gone by their last Test shot. with Teste, they should keep working it, and I mean hard until the bitter end until they stop actually feeling the effects. Physiological I guess, is the way I look at it. But in the end, I feel they can make the same gains off of each if taken correctly and they ride it out blind folded not knowing or feeling when the pin is going to start or stop and knowing there is a 5-10% difference because of molecular ester binding. Think about it if you added 5-10% more TestE-C what would your final post PCT output be.

[OuchThatHurts]

I think the way OTH and I view it is that Test is Test, but they do react a little different. Sort of like TrenA has a kick that TrenE doesn't. In the end though you are talking about the same compound, but shorter esters give that instant gratification and they do not hold as much molecular weight as the higher esters do so you end up getting more Test per CC. In the end, they are the same, just different ways to execute them. What I and would imagine OTH looks at is the end result. What do you get from 20ml of TestE as apposed to 20ml of TestP after PCT and a couple of weeks rolled by. In the end, IMO the only real difference would be stemmed from psych value of having the TestP kick in faster and feeling results faster. That and the fact that TestP does house more Test per square inch as explained. I also think there is a psych involved with users "giving up" and not pushing hard after a few days have gone by their last Test shot. with Teste, they should keep working it, and I mean hard until the bitter end until they stop actually feeling the effects. Physiological I guess, is the way I look at it. But in the end, I feel they can make the same gains off of each if taken correctly and they ride it out blind folded not knowing or feeling when the pin is going to start or stop and knowing there is a 5-10% difference because of molecular ester binding. Think about it if you added 5-10% more TestE-C what would your final post PCT output be.
What I can say is that WISH I got a different "feeling" or result from different tests. I've done, like many here, soooo much test... Almost hurts to think about it. At this point, whether you gave me prop, phenlyprop, enanthate, cyp, decanoate, whatever, I would make a cycle out of it. It's not hard to feel when your body is high in androgens - the hot skin, the oil slick on your forehead. I guess the only exception would be suspension. When test is circulating in your blood stream and plugging your cell receptors, your body doesn't care where it came from... but if people can say they notice a difference, who am I to say they don't. I used to be disappointed if my guy only had cyp and I couldn't get enanthate. I'd have sworn I could tell a difference. Now though, it doesn't matter. Is is psychological? Possibly. Even the suspension... you're getting a truckload of test straight to the bloodstream. I would hazard a guess that if you dosed a short esterified test like prop super heavy, you'd get the same feeling and response, it would just last for two days and maybe turn your prostate into a grapefruit. I'm not volunteering for a trial run though. If I didn't really mind injections, which in fact, I do, I wouldn't mind a prop cycle... I just hate that needle. I don't like the feeling and especially when you go balls deep with those 1.5 inch needles. Oy vey! What I DO like now is going on hard and coming off fast. I don't like to wait to feel it and I don't like to wait to start PCT. And don't even get me started about blends... I know, I know... people love them. I feel like shit on them. I'm up and down and all over the place with blends. And I've tried EOD, twice a week, once a week, forget it. It's hard enough to stay stable with just common single esters, let alone a quartet. I'm not ranting, I love testosterone. I knew a few... okay more than a few now, years ago when I firs tried it that I was better on it... You know the "So this is what I'm supposed to feel like!" bit.

p.s. when I said "balls deep" I just meant "all the way" so nobody point any sharp objects at your balls!!!

[tatteredxangelx]

my opinion is that prop hurts a lot, and if u want the BEST id go with supertest, only b/c u feel the prop and suspension right away ... those first 4 weeks SUCK! other than that, they are all the same ...

[Alin]

Ive been using TEST E, but i have been getting diff remarks from alot of people, saying that there are better TEST to use, what are your all opinions, which do you think is better, i like the results ive been getting from it, but ive alot of people say that SUSTONON 300 is way better, what do you all think, please let me , know.

thank you
Brian


I think they are all great and have their particular place, alot will depend on how many injections you want to do per week. Overall, Test E or Cyp is my pick.

[lastmanstanding]

I think they are all great and have their particular place, alot will depend on how many injections you want to do per week. Overall, Test E or Cyp is my pick.
so is that why U stoped selling the prop amps ? :D
oh come on Alin start selling some Viromone then every body is going to tell the difference ;)

[Tyree33]

Alin always sums up every question w/ the easiest explanation possible; and so far I have yet to disagree w/ him. Just listen to what the man said and u'll do just fine bud. Good luck-and hit it hard.
-T-